How does NIL impact college tennis?

How does NIL impact college tennis?

After SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against the NCAA, the NCAA implemented an interim policy on July 1st, 2021 that allowed college athletes to profit off of their Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL). Like many, I was surprised at how quickly this all transpired and, at the time, I had a fairly myopic view of what this could potentially mean for athletes (e.g. shilling products on Instagram). This article intends to share some interesting figures about the most followed college tennis players on Instagram and also expand further into why I think this will unlock additional revenue opportunities for players who want to put in the work. 


The most followed college tennis players on Instagram

In an effort to understand which players might be most positioned to take advantage of their existing social media following, I looked at the most followed players on Instagram, with a few caveats:

  • Must be currently enrolled in school (i.e. recently graduated players are excluded)

  • Ranked in the season-ending ITA top 50

Note that these follower counts are from July 1st and are ever-changing!!


Most Followed Men

Ronnie Hohmann of LSU is the most followed man with over twice as many followers as the runner-up. Full list:


ITA Rank

Player

School

IG Followers

36

Ronnie Hohmann

LSU

7,750

18

Trent Bryde

University of Georgia

3,377

22

Rinky Hijikata

North Carolina

3,265

1

Liam Draxl

University of Kentucky

3,224

15

Eliot Spizzirri

University of Texas

2,820

23

Philip Henning

University of Georgia

2,741

5

Duarte Vale

University of Florida

2,735

2

Sam Riffice

University of Florida

2,649

50

Blaise Bicknell

University of Florida

2,512

9

Johannus Monday

University Of Tennessee

2,315


A few notables:

  • Blumberg would fall second on this list with 4,681 followers, but he graduated and is therefore excluded. 

  • Ben Shelton would be third with 3,372 followers, but he's not in the ITA top 50 and is therefore excluded

  • UGA, UF, and Texas are the only schools with 2+ players in the top 50 with an average > 2K


Most Followed Women

Peyton Stearns of Texas is the most followed woman with almost 2x as many followers as the nearest player. Full list:


ITA Rank

Player

School

IG Followers

13

Peyton Stearns

University of Texas

7,263

2

Emma Navarro

University of Virginia

3,771

4

Abigail Forbes

UCLA

3,653

21

Alexa Noel

University of Iowa

2,515

25

Meg Kowalski

University of Georgia

1,919

43

Chloe Beck

Duke University

1,737

49

Cameron Morra

North Carolina

1,698

14

Irina Cantos Siemers

Ohio State University

1,654

46

Solymar Colling

University of San Diego

1,640

12

Georgia Drummy

Duke University

1,530


A few notables:

  • Jokic (UGA) would be first on this list with 8,063 followers but she graduated

  • Ewing (USC) would be #2 on this list behind Stearns with 4,707 followers (per Google) but her IG is currently deactivated

  • Ansari (Auburn, #67): 3,443 and Coppoc (UGA, #92): 2,715 would make this list but they’re not in the ITA top 50

  • Klara Mrcela of Cleveland State has over 153k IG followers but isn’t in the ITA top 50


So what does NIL mean for college tennis?

After sharing some of those IG following numbers, I had several people reach out and ask me if I thought NIL would really matter. Could college tennis athletes actually make money from this? And my answer is yes! But they’d have to work for it. Here are the top 3 reasons I’m excited for NIL:


  1. It finally brings parity to college athletes and non-college athletes

This is the biggest point I want to underscore. Now, athletes are no longer restricted by the NCAA in the ways they can make money off the court which will greatly reduce the red-tape and anxiety around breaking rules that’s historically plagued players. For example, let’s say you were a non-athlete in an acapella group at school and you had a YouTube channel posting videos of you singing. There were no issues with you monetizing that YouTube channel through ads. But if you’re a tennis player and want to post videos of you hitting forehands and monetize that? That was not allowed. Let’s take an even more extreme, non-tennis example. Jake Kuhlman played tennis at University of North Dakota and has since become TikTok famous, boasting over 1.6M followers and 57.6M likes, for reasons totally unrelated to his tennis ability. If he wanted to retain NCAA eligibility, he wouldn’t be allowed to monetize those channels by taking brand deals or joining something like the TikTok creator fund which pays creators based on their video views. (Note: Jake is no longer on the UND tennis team, I’m just using him as an example for if players create social media presences that are unrelated to tennis that NIL now allows them to monetize). This extends to many other examples such as getting merch or free dinner from the local diner. 


  1. Increase in paid hitting/coaching opportunities

Previously, college players could get paid for coaching camps, so long as it was at the “going-rate.” Now, with NIL, players can actually market their services in their local community either through a service like Universal Tennis Paid Hits or a local club. They can make additional money at these summer camps by being paid to promote the camp on social media, doing autograph or photo sessions, charging extra for hitting sessions, etc. 


  1. Brand deals, affiliate links, and more

Every athlete has a hometown, a local club, and a following. There’s a reason that micro-influencers already exist. It doesn’t take 1M followers to make decent money from your social accounts. To take a timely example, if I run the ATP Atlanta event, why not give every UGA and Georgia Tech player a discount code for tickets and give them a percentage kickback for any ticket sales they drive? Or if I’m a local Austin tennis shop, why not give Peyton Stearns some money to post about us? There are a lot of examples that local businesses or smaller brands can take advantage of. 



There’ll be so much more to unpack in the coming months with NIL. Will we see tennis players bringing in the 7-figures like an Alabama QB? No. But NIL creates opportunities for every college tennis player, at every level, to generate extra income should they choose. That’s a win in my book.


Comments